General

N6.3bn fraud: Court rules in favour of Jang, second…

N6.3bn fraud: Court rules in favour of Jang, second…

From Bere,

State High Court, Judge Justice Christy Dabup, yesterday, ruled that the disputed statements obtained by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) in the ongoing involving a former governor of the state, Jonah Jang, were not voluntary and, therefore, cannot be tendered as evidence in court.

Justice Dabup, who gave the ruling yesterday in the conclusion of the trial-within-trial, after taking arguments from to the , rejected the EFCC claim that the statements were voluntary.

Are you a Man 40 yrs and above? Do not miss the Vital , it goes off in 2 days! CLICH HERE to READ .

Jang, who as governor of state between 2007 and 2015, is standing trial alongside Pam, a former cashier in the Office of the Secretary to the State Government over an alleged misappropriation of public funds amounting to over N6.3 .

Before the ruling by the court yesterday, the counsel, Rotimi Williams, SAN, had called a witness, Sunday Musa, to testify.

An investigator with the EFCC, Musa, had told the court how Yusuf Pam, the second defendant, withdrew cash running into of and it over to the former governor.

He claimed that their investigation revealed that the money was part of the N2 billion which the Central of Federal of gave to the state government as loan in 2015 for disbursement to medium and small scale enterprises, but which was not done.

But when the EFCC counsel sought to tender the  statements, which the commission obtained from the second defendant, Pam, as exhibit through Musa, Pam’s counsel, S. Oyawole, an objection and argued that the said statements were obtained under duress from his and, therefore, inadmissible in court.

The development had prompted the court to a trial-within-trial to determine whether the statements were voluntarily given.

The prosecution witness admitted that none was present except the team of investigators when the confessional statements were obtained. The second defendant his present, but they did not oblige him.

The case, which is ongoing, is expected to continue .

Pegars is a media company that covers all news nationally and internationally. We have been trusted by millions of audience without any limitation on area of coverage. Thank you for trusting us and visiting our platform regularly.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>




Enter Captcha Here :